Follow Patrick Linkedin Twitter Facebook
Email Patrick Email
Legal Issues
Aug 15, 2015

Deferred Prosecution Agreements And Non-Prosecution Agreements

Sponsored Content provided by Patrick Mincey - Criminal Defense Attorney, Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog LLP

Over the past decade, two novel approaches to resolving corporate criminal investigations have developed: the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) and Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).  The next few Insights will include some observations about these alternative resolutions to corporate criminal investigations and prosecutions, beginning today with a discussion of some basics.
 
A DPA is a voluntary alternative to adjudication in which a prosecutor agrees to grant amnesty in exchange for the defendant agreeing to fulfill certain requirements. An NPA operates in the same way, only the agreement takes place before criminal charges have been formally brought against the defendant. A case of corporate fraud, for instance, might be settled by means of a DPA in which the defendant agrees to pay fines, implement corporate reforms, and fully cooperate with the investigation. Fulfillment of the specified requirements will then result in dismissal of the charges.
 
The U.S. Department of Justice has been deploying DPAs and NPAs aggressively. The last 18 months or so have left no doubt that such resolutions are a vital part of the federal corporate law enforcement arsenal, affording the U.S. government an avenue both to punish and reform corporations accused of wrongdoing. One senior official was recently quoted stating that these types of settlements can be “a more powerful tool than actually going to trial.” The general goal of the prosecution is to require companies to implement an effective compliance program.
 
Department of Justice policy instructs prosecutors to enter into a DPA or NPA in circumstances “where the collateral consequences of a corporate conviction for innocent third parties would be significant.” Such agreements are designed to allow the company to remain in business, so as to preserve jobs and shareholder value, and increase the likelihood that victims will receive prompt restitution. The government seeks to achieve general and specific deterrence typically by requiring substantial changes to the company’s governance and operations, requiring regular reports on the progress of those reforms from a compliance monitor or the company itself, and reserving the power to revive criminal charges if the company is deemed to be noncompliant.
 
Generally, these agreements will include the following terms:

  • Acceptance of a statement of facts describing illegal acts and/or an admission of wrongdoing;
  • Agreement that the company, its employees, and agents will not publicly contradict the statement of facts;
  • Cooperation with the government for the duration of the agreement, including the provision of documents and efforts to secure employee testimony;
  • Remedial efforts such as the enhancement of compliance programs, a corporate integrity agreement, and/or monitorship;
  • Fines and penalties;
  • Obligation to report future violations of the law;
  • Waiver of the statute of limitations; and
  • Acknowledgement that the government has sole discretion to determine whether the agreement has been breached, and upon breach, the agreed statement of facts shall be admissible in a prosecution of the company.
Such agreements impose burdens and have collateral consequences of which companies should be wary. We’ll discuss those considerations in my next Insights.   
 
Patrick Mincey is a trial lawyer in Wilmington, where he founded the Criminal Defense Group at Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog LLP. His criminal practice ranges from representing individuals and corporate clients who are targets, subjects or witnesses in federal and state white collar proceedings to “blue collar” defendants charged with murder, drug conspiracies and assaults. To contact Patrick Mincey, call (910) 777-6017 or email him at [email protected].  

Wbj insights revised 0510 61715110749
Ico insights

INSIGHTS

SPONSORS' CONTENT
Jessiepowellheadshot webversion

5 Reasons to Build Custom Franchise Software

Jessie Powell - Wide Open Tech
2022052 75 142344351

Bridging Futures: The Case for Toll Funding in Wilmington’s Cape Fear Memorial Bridge Revamp

Natalie English - Wilmington Chamber of Commerce
Chris 16239425

‘Creative,’ An Adjective To Describe Your Accountant?!

Chris Capone - Capone & Associates

Trending News

Bank, Nonprofit Look To Lease Skyline Center Space From City

Emma Dill - Feb 19, 2024

Homebuilders Association Adds Taylor As Director Of Business Development

Staff Reports - Feb 20, 2024

Insurance Company Leases Space In Upcoming Midtown Office Building

Cece Nunn - Feb 20, 2024

Coffee Shop, Bar Takes Flight In Downtown Wilmington

Laura Moore - Feb 21, 2024

Local Women's Impact Network Announces Board Officers, Members

Staff Reports - Feb 20, 2024

In The Current Issue

Pickler Provides Place To Play

Today, the House of Pickleball has around 2,000 members....


MADE: IKA Works Inc. Equips Labs

IKA Works Inc. manufactures products used by universities, biotech companies and more....


Trouble Brewing: How A Social Media Post Bubbled Over For A Wilmington Brewery

Social media can influence which local breweries are favored among patrons and restaurants. This dynamic played out recently with an online...

Book On Business

The 2024 WilmingtonBiz: Book on Business is an annual publication showcasing the Wilmington region as a center of business.

Order Your Copy Today!


Galleries

Videos

2023 Power Breakfast: Major Developments